The Diplomatic Boycott of the Beijing Winter Olympics, Explained

Do repost and rate:

This month, the United States announced a diplomatic boycott of the Beijing Winter Olympics in February, a move that was quickly followed by Australia, Britain and Canada.

Diplomacy is by its nature byzantine, and sometimes secretive as well. We’ll try to get to the bottom of what it all means.

Those who remember the 1980s may think of an Olympic boycott as countries staying home, athletes and all. But the U.S. diplomatic boycott will preclude only government officials from attending. Typically, high-ranking officials from many countries attend the Games, which are among the biggest international gatherings outside of the United Nations and major summits.

In announcing the decision, Jen Psaki, the White House press secretary, cited “genocide and crimes against humanity” in Xinjiang, a northwestern region of China. The Chinese government has cracked down harshly on Uyghurs and other predominantly Muslim ethnic minorities in that region, including mass detentions and forced use of contraception and sterilizations.

Calls for an Olympic boycott sharpened after Peng Shuai, a Chinese tennis star, accused a former top government official of sexually assaulting her. References to her accusation were quickly scrubbed from the internet in China, and she disappeared from public view, prompting athletes and others around the world to post, “Where is Peng Shuai?” Peng was later seen in several short videos shared by Chinese state media journalists on Twitter. The International Olympic Committee said it called her twice, but questions were raised about how freely she was speaking.

Several other countries have signaled that they, too, will keep their top officials away from the Winter Games to express displeasure with China’s policies, while stopping short of prohibiting athletes from going.

  • Trade Policy: The new trade deal announced by President Biden during a trip to Asia is based on two big ideas: containing China and moving away from a focus on markets and tariffs.
  • Taiwan: The Biden administration, which has pledged to defend Taiwan in the case of a Chinese attack, has accelerated efforts to boost the territory’s defense systems and will pursue trade negotiations with the island.
  • China: Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken said that the administration aims to “shape the strategic environment” around China to curb its aggressions, offering a rare glimpse into President Biden’s strategy on the Asian superpower. 
  • South Pacific: As Beijing seeks a sweeping regional deal with Pacific Island nations, the United States is left playing catch-up in an increasingly vital arena of its global competition with China.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson of Britain announced in early December that there would be “effectively a diplomatic boycott” of the Games. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of Canada said his country would follow suit. Prime Minister Scott Morrison of Australia, citing concerns over the abuses in Xinjiang and China’s criticism of Australia’s plans for new nuclear submarines, said his government’s officials would not attend.

Japan announced on Dec. 24 that it would not send an official government delegation to the Games, although it stopped short of calling the decision a diplomatic boycott. The top government spokesman, Hirokazu Matsuno, told reporters that Japan had arrived at the decision on its own. The decision aligns the country with the United States while avoiding an official snub of China, Japan’s largest trade partner.

Instead of a government delegation, Japan will send top officials responsible for the Tokyo Olympics, which was held in the summer after a one-year delay.

There has largely been support for the move. If anything, the criticism has come from Republicans who say the decision does not go far enough. Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas has said the United States “should fully boycott the genocide Games in Beijing.”

Image
Credit...Frederic J. Brown/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

Although the hostility between the nations may make for some uncomfortable moments for the American athletes in Beijing, there are not expected to be any significant effects. The athletes are to travel to China and compete in their events as scheduled.

Some have. Evan Bates, an American ice dancer, said in October: “Speaking on behalf of all the athletes, I can say human rights violations are abysmal, and we all believe that it tears the fabric of humanity.” He added, “My answer could be applicable to human rights at large, but if you’re asking what’s happening in China regarding the Muslims, it’s terrible, it’s awful.” Some others have echoed his sentiments.

The International Olympic Committee has always steadfastly asserted that the Games are nonpolitical. As such, it has strict rules about athletes protesting while at the Games.

At this point, no. Even those top athletes who have condemned human rights abuses say they plan to compete at the Games.

In 2014, President Barack Obama, Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and Michelle Obama, the first lady, all skipped the Sochi Olympics in Russia. France and Germany also did not send top-ranking officials. Although it was not a full-fledged diplomatic boycott, the move was seen as a rebuke of Russia’s crackdown on gay rights and was also possibly motivated by Russia’s giving political asylum to Edward Snowden, who leaked classified documents about American spying.

Image
The closing ceremony of the 1980 Summer Olympics in Moscow. More than 60 countries, led by the United States, boycotted those Games.
Credit...Associated Press

The most prominent boycott came in 1980, when more than 60 countries, led by the United States, boycotted the Summer Games in Moscow because of the Soviet Union’s invasion of Afghanistan the previous year. The boycott crippled the fields in many events at the Games, and also incensed American athletes, many of whom lost their only chance to participate at an Olympics.

In 1984, the Soviet Union led more than a dozen countries in a boycott of the 1984 Games in Los Angeles. Although the cited reason was security concerns, there is little doubt the move was essentially a reprisal for the 1980 boycott.

While a handful of nations had boycotted for various reasons at earlier Games, the first major boycott of an Olympics came in 1976 when about 30 mostly African nations sat out the Montreal Games. They contended that because a New Zealand rugby team had toured apartheid South Africa, New Zealand should be barred from the Games.

In 1936, the Games went to Germany, then under the control of Hitler’s Nazi Party. Some sports officials, and some politicians, including Mayor Fiorello La Guardia of New York City and Gov. Al Smith of New York, advocated boycotting the Games. But Olympic officials pushed hard against a boycott, with familiar arguments about separation of politics and sports.

Avery Brundage, who was president of the U.S. Olympic Committee, called the boycott plan a “Jewish-Communist conspiracy.” (He went on to lead the International Olympic Committee until 1972.)

In the end, U.S. sports officials chose to send a team to Berlin in a close vote.

The boycott of the Moscow Games did not appear to have any effect on Soviet foreign policy; troops from the country remained in Afghanistan until 1989.

An international consensus seems to have emerged that sweeping boycotts that include athletes are ineffective and serve only to penalize sportsmen and women. Senator Cotton notwithstanding, few Olympic or government officials are seriously considering preventing athletes from attending the Beijing Games.

While boycotts may not change policy, they do run the risk of reprisals, as was seen in 1984. Sure enough, Chen Weihua of China Daily, a state media publication, has called for China to boycott the Summer Olympics in Los Angeles in 2028.

Regulation and Society adoption

Ждем новостей

Нет новых страниц

Следующая новость