Decentralization and citizenship

The following text is based on my current work with decentralized citizenships. 

During the period of 1990-2020, academic on citizenship has focused on various aspects, resulting in numerous findings and conclusions. Here are some key themes and conclusions that emerged in studies on citizenship during this time:

1. The shift from a nation-state focus to transnationalism: As globalization has increased the interconnectedness of people across national borders, studies have shifted from examining citizenship solely within the context of nation-states to exploring transnational and global citizenship. Researchers have found that migrants and other transnational actors maintain multiple allegiances, navigate complex identities, and contribute to the social, economic, and political life of both their home and host countries.
2. Multiculturalism and the politics of recognition: Researchers have analyzed the challenges and opportunities of multiculturalism within diverse societies. These studies have highlighted the importance of recognizing and valuing cultural differences, promoting social inclusion, and ensuring equal rights for minority groups. The concept of cultural citizenship has emerged as an important area of study, focusing on the role of cultural identity and participation in shaping citizenship.
3. Citizenship education: Academics have extensively researched the role of citizenship education in preparing young people to become active, informed, and responsible citizens. They have found that effective citizenship education programs promote critical thinking, foster democratic values, and encourage civic engagement.
4. Social and economic rights: Researchers have examined the role of social and economic rights in shaping social citizenship. They have highlighted the importance of welfare systems, access to healthcare, education, and other social services in promoting social cohesion and reducing inequality.
5. The impact of technology: The rise of digital technologies has led to the emergence of digital or e-citizenship as a new area of research. Scholars have investigated the role of the internet and social media in shaping political participation, civic engagement, and the formation of new digital communities.
6. Gender and citizenship: Gender has been a critical focus of citizenship studies during this period, with researchers examining how gender shapes citizenship rights, responsibilities, and identities. They have found that gendered norms and expectations continue to influence political representation, access to social services, and other aspects of citizenship.

These themes and conclusions reflect the changing nature of citizenship during the period of 1990-2020, influenced by globalization, migration, technological advancements, and shifting social dynamics. These studies have contributed to a more nuanced understanding of citizenship that goes beyond traditional legal boundaries and encompasses individuals' complex and interconnected experiences in contemporary societies.

Decentralization is a process through which the decision-making authority, power, or control is distributed and shifted from a central or concentrated point to multiple, lower-level entities or units. This can occur in various contexts, such as political, administrative, economic, or organizational structures. Decentralization aims to improve efficiency, responsiveness, and local autonomy by empowering lower-level units to make decisions that best suit their specific needs and circumstances.

Decentralization can take different forms:

1. Political decentralization: In this form, political power and decision-making authority are transferred from the central government to regional, state, or local governments. This can involve granting more autonomy to these lower-level entities or giving them more control over policy-making and resource allocation.
2. Administrative decentralization: This type of decentralization involves delegating responsibility for planning, implementing, and managing public services to lower-level administrative units or agencies. This can improve the efficiency and responsiveness of public service delivery by bringing decision-making closer to the communities being served.
3. Fiscal decentralization refers to transferring financial authority and resources from the central government to lower-level entities. This can involve granting lower-level governments the authority to raise their revenue or allocate resources according to their priorities and needs.
4. Market or economic decentralization: In this form, economic decision-making and resource allocation are transferred from centralized authorities or state-owned enterprises to private-sector actors, such as businesses and individuals. This can promote competition, innovation, and economic efficiency.

Decentralization is often seen as a way to improve governance, promote local autonomy, and increase the responsiveness and efficiency of public services. However, it can also present challenges, such as potential imbalances in resources and capacities across different regions and the risk of creating fragmented or uncoordinated systems. The success of decentralization often depends on the specific context, institutional arrangements, and the capacity of local entities to effectively manage their new responsibilities. 

Decentralization in the context of citizenship, communities, and network states involves rethinking the traditional, centralized concept of citizenship based on a nation-state and exploring alternative ways to define membership, rights, and responsibilities that are more distributed and flexible. This shift can be attributed to globalization, technological advancements, and the increasing importance of transnational and digital networks.

Here are some key aspects of decentralization in this context:

1. Transnational communities and citizenship: Globalization and migration have led to the emergence of transnational communities, where individuals maintain strong connections to multiple countries, often across borders. Decentralized citizenship in this context involves recognizing and accommodating the rights and responsibilities of these individuals within multiple political, social, and cultural systems.
2. Network states and multilevel governance: As political decision-making becomes more complex and interconnected, some scholars argue that the traditional nation-state model is evolving into a "network state" characterized by multilevel governance. This involves a more decentralized approach where decision-making authority is distributed across various levels, such as supranational, national, regional, and local entities and non-state actors.
3. Digital communities and e-citizenship: The rise of the internet and digital technologies has enabled the formation of digital communities that transcend geographical boundaries. These communities may develop their own norms, values, and forms of governance, giving rise to the concept of e-citizenship. E-citizenship involves the rights, responsibilities, and identity of individuals within digital networks, and may require new forms of decentralized governance and regulation that adapt to the unique characteristics of these spaces.
4. Decentralized identity systems: Technological advancements, such as blockchain, have enabled the development of decentralized identity systems that allow individuals to manage their own personal information and control how it is shared with others. This can have implications for citizenship, as it could shift the control of identity management from centralized authorities to individuals and communities, offering more privacy and autonomy.

Decentralization in the context of citizenship, communities, and network states challenges the traditional, centralized model of citizenship based on nation-states. It encourages new ways of thinking about membership, rights, and responsibilities that better reflect contemporary societies' complex and interconnected nature. This shift can lead to more flexible and inclusive forms of citizenship that can adapt to individuals' and communities' diverse needs and experiences.

Decentralized citizenships, as a concept, are still emerging and need to be more widely adopted than traditional nation-state-based citizenships. However, there are some examples of initiatives and communities that can be considered decentralized or alternative forms of citizenship:

1. Digital or e-citizenship: Some countries, like Estonia, offer e-residency programs that provide digital identities and access to various services, such as business registration and online banking, regardless of an individual's physical location. While e-residency does not grant legal citizenship or the right to reside in the country, it enables people to participate in digital communities and access services across borders.
2. City-based citizenship: Some cities or regions are exploring the idea of offering local citizenship to residents, regardless of their national citizenship status. For example, Barcelona has proposed city-level citizenship that would grant residents access to certain rights and services within the city, regardless of their legal status in Spain.
3. Blockchain-based citizenship: Several projects are exploring the use of blockchain technology to create decentralized identity and citizenship systems. These systems enable individuals to manage their own identity data and control how it is shared with others, potentially challenging traditional, centralized forms of identity management. While these initiatives are still in the early stages of development, they represent a new approach to thinking about citizenship in a decentralized context.
4. Global or cosmopolitan citizenship: Although not a decentralized citizenship in the conventional sense, the concept of global citizenship emphasizes individual responsibility towards global issues, transcending national boundaries. Some organizations, such as the World Service Authority, issue World Passports as a symbolic gesture to promote the idea of global citizenship and human rights.

Thanks for reading. You can support and reward my writing via: 

[email protected]

 - NCG6LBALQHENQUSR77KOR6SS42FGK54BZ5L2HFDSBGQVLGYIOVWYDXFDI4

 – addr1q9vfs6nqz4xmtnpljwhv4tukyskd2g7enxd87rpugkwwvfun5pnla5d5tes2mvurrc77e7837yd0scrfk063qlha8wgs8d4ynz

Bitcoin 3HbxyDXE9MhNQ8RqsirqgYvFupQzh5Xby2

 - 0x8982cdb97bd23f092f78a16a4fc93c5c4607a285

– vladlausevic

Skycoin – ZxjhWMJRbTNCRQzy5MekZzH4fhdWFCqBP8

Tezos?—?tz1QrRzkTAKuPKF8dmGW6c1ScEHBUGvoiJBM