These Firms Cut Proposed Spot Bitcoin ETF Fees Amid Industry Competition

Do repost and rate:

Several firms have recently reduced their proposed fees, as revealed in the latest versions of their S-1 forms submitted to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

This is in response to the ongoing industry competition, amplified by the anticipation surrounding the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) decision on spot Bitcoin ETFs.

Spot Bitcoin ETF Fee Wars Escalate

As the SEC deadline approaches, various applicants, including Valkyrie, WisdomTree, BlackRock, VanEck, Invesco, Galaxy, Grayscale, and ARK Invest, have revised their fees to gain a competitive edge.

Fidelity has lowered its fees from 0.39% to 0.25% bps and is offering a fee waiver of 0% through July 31, 2024. Bitwise is charging a fee of 0% for the first six months and the first $1 billion in assets, followed by a 0.20% fee.

ARK Invest and 21Shares have also slashed their fees from 0.25% to 0.21%. The company is upholding its zero fees policy for six months or until the total assets reach $1 billion.

BlackRock has adjusted its sponsor fee for its potential spot Bitcoin ETF to 0.25%, a reduction from the previous 0.3%. Additionally, the investment giant has lowered its temporary discount for the first $5 billion of assets in the initial 12 months from launch to 0.12%, down from 0.2%, as stated in the S-1 form today.

WisdomTree reduced its fee from 0.5% to 0.30%, with Galaxy Invesco lowering its fee from 0.59% to 0.39%.

Valkyrie introduced a three-month fee waiver, reducing its fee from 0.80% to 0.49%. Meanwhile, Hashdex maintained its sponsor fee at 0.90%, and Grayscale lowered its fee from 2% on January 8 to 1.5%, making it the pricier option among the group.

As the fee wars intensify, James Seyffart cautions that these fees still need to be finalized, leaving room for further adjustments.

Industry Sentiment

Amidst the ongoing adjustments, Bloomberg senior ETF analyst Eric Balchunas described the current situation as similar to compressing two years’ worth of fee wars into just a couple of days, emphasizing that while such battles can be challenging for issuers, they create a favorable environment for investors.

The fee wars have also sparked various theories about the motivations behind the fee cuts. Nic Carter sees the trend of bargain-basement fees as a sign of “massive expectations” from issuers regarding the volume of inflows they anticipate.

Peter Atwater offers a contrasting perspective. He suggests that issuers engaging in an aggressive fee war are conducting an extensive asset grab, even if it means sacrificing profitability.

Atwater also posted on X that organizations typically wait to assess their sales potential before resorting to price slashes.

Regulation and Society adoption

Events&meetings

Ждем новостей

Нет новых страниц

Следующая новость