P2P both sides of the coin. P2P A peer to peer network has a series of advantages that are very beneficial when it comes to sharing files, such as the speed of being able to send and receive in real time, the fact that you do not have to have a third party for said file transfers thanks to the decentralization or shipping security in terms of the geographical distance that is capable of saving the digital being. This something is very obvious but we will see later that it has its importance. Suppose for vital reasons I am moving to Germany for example. As I am a digital creative I can send the banners or gifs that I design to any part of the world. I can charge in cryptocurrency or fiat and I can even send a file with my design and have the client print it at home. All this is thanks to P2P eliminating third parties in the process and saving time and money. The other side of the coin. Everything is great for a 100% digital world not for the real, tangible world. Following the previous example, suppose that what changes is that I paint oil paintings. On the subject of communications with my clients and payments, P2P continues to fulfill its function and benefit me, but what about the product? As it is something physical, it must be sent to the client with all that it implies: Transport of merchandise, customs fees, etc. So the P2P in terms of physical assets is not an advance. Is a P2P network possible for physical goods moving around the world? The importance of the transport of merchandise for the countries and for globalization is something very important. Currently new alternatives are appearing that can suppose a kind of P2P for physical elements. Third parties are not eliminated in the transaction, which is complicated, but it does reduce costs. To give an example, startups are beginning to emerge that with the method of sharing transport between individuals, shipments of certain goods are made. Something curious to be aware of.
