Celsius Token Holders Lose Bid to Hike CEL Valuation

Trading prices don’t reflect reality because the market for CEL was manipulated, and the court could even have valued it at a lower or zero price on a par with what stockholders could expect in bankruptcy, the company argued in opposition to the token holders.

Two token holders, Santos Caceres and Otis Davis, lobbied the court to be able to take part in the bankruptcy negotiations via a special committee of CEL holders, which Judge Martin Glenn also rejected.

“Nothing in the motions, this order, or announced at the hearing, constitutes a finding under the federal securities laws as to whether crypto tokens or transactions involving crypto tokens are securities,” Glenn said, seeking to avoid intervening in a heated dispute with the Securities and Exchange Commission over the regulatory status of CEL and other cryptoassets.

Celsius’ management have proposed to value CEL at $0.25, as they seek to wind up the companies’ affairs, hasten a sale to crypto consortium Fahrenheit, and return funds to creditors. That valuation, itself a raise from a previous $0.20, appeared in a disclosure statement related to the sale to Fahrenheit which was approved by Glenn last week.

In January, Shoba Pillay, an independent examiner Glenn appointed, said the market in CEL was largely created by the company itself, to the profit of insiders such as then-Chief Executive Officer Alex Mashinsky. Regulators have since arrested Mashinsky on charges including market manipulation, to which he has pleaded not guilty.

Creditors have one month to consider and vote on the sale plan.

Read more: Celsius Creditors to Vote on Bankruptcy-Escape Plan After Judicial Approval