The SEC is focusing on the stablecoin, but why the government aims to prevent the future?
People only see the SEC is an enemy of crypto but do you think crypto is always the right way?
After the FTX, crypto has changed. It becomes a self-delusion to want to get into its own mind.
If you really research Paxos, you will find something very strange.
Paxos is an issuer for BUSD, a stablecoin that linked to Binance, one of the largest crypto exchanges.
Issuer of stablecoin needs crypto exchange to help arbitrage to make profits but what if the crypto exchange highly leveraged the stablecoin itself?
There is no rule to prevent crypto exchange from doing so even it is a self-destruction act.
But FTX did it, why not?!
The real question is, who are behind those stablecoin projects?
We do not know, and that is a big problem!
Photo by Robert AnaschUnsplash
Note: the post was shared on multiple platformsDon’t forget to check out my new book
You can refer my previous article lists
Things that do not work out in crypto after 14 years of its creationCrypto has a lying problem
Crypto bro problem
History repeats itself
Banks stay away from crypto for now
Disputes between DCG and Gemini
New NFTs Trend
SEC Lawsuits
Why play to earn is a slavery game
Why AI is more convincing than blockchain
Bitcoin got one more problem
The thesis against Crypto Exchanges
Does Bitcoin negatively correlate to the dollar
Why Ethereum reputation is in question
Crypto whales are secretly dumping
Why Ethereum killers are killing themselves
One more thing NFT can do
Crypto is a good investment or not
Say no to FOMO
About my new book
Market is up today but why
What is up with market today
When the safest security got hacked
Why the government tried to regulate crypto but fail
Era of influence
Serious of crypto
Humanity in crypto
Position of Crypto
The only way
Why staking is in trouble sort of
Pressure Cooker Environment