Smell what sells, as the saying goes.
As a newcomer to crypto and also, the P0X platform, my handful of posts appear to be better received if they contain Crypto in the title. To be fair, I haven't written enough on here to be able to means test this theory, but I have always been more intuitive than research based in my approach to learning new systems. My intuition also tells me that it is more lightly than not, that the majority of my will most lightly have been scrolled down to, past the content in order to find the magic free money slider. It takes one to know one, right? Despite this mechanic, I do find myself usually reading at least part of an article that catches my interest as I scroll towards the bottom of the screen. When I do this and my attention has been entertained with good quality content, my tips to other contributors tend towards the generous.
My personal supposition that intuition is a human trait is unlikely to change, something that the emergence of AI and deep learning has reinforced. These tools seem to have emerged in order to allow us the freedom to daydream. Eventually, these processes are going to lead to a world where us humans can detach ourselves from the self-inflicted industrialized lifestyles that have led our society to focus on financial gain and economic growth as our core means of survival. And, if cryptographically encrypted currency is indeed the future, then it is inevitable that humans will hand over the reigns of the blockchains to AI.
The capacity for the human collective to develop tools is astonishing, but the maintenance and upkeep of these tools and the systems that emerge as a result, appear to be our key struggle. The systems become too large to understand fully. It is human nature to create, and the act of creation is inevitably intuitive. It is also human nature to destroy and then re-build. The problem with intuition is that it is often informed by cognitive bias. If someone is convinced that A + B = C, then unless they are willing to go against the emotional draw of feeling they are right, that the effort they put into learning this fact, and that their experience as an emotional creature has not been in vain, then it is very hard to change their approach to that particular problem. AI on the other hand can change its mind and re calculate an approach as many times as it needs to in order to find the most efficient solution. There is no artificial ego that I am aware of. This is not an invitation to invent one, that would be a mistake.
These thoughts may be coming as a reaction to the realization that I will never be able to intuitively grasp the world of cryptocurrency. The complexities and language surrounding the subject are too vast. The markets too volatile, and the amount of possibilities dumbfounding. I imagine this will become the case for anyone who decides to explore this world. If this is to be the future, with true economic freedom being the ultimate goal along with a more harmonized and open social structure available to us. It would be a shame to all be tied to trying to anticipate the chaotic nature of the market. There is also a good chance that the chaotic nature is a reflection of our own seemingly chaotic instincts. The human condition.
We are already on the way to handing over responsibility to AI. I'm sure someone will be working on it, or at least academic research being carried out. If the entire world is eventually going to transition to decentralized finance, then there will have to be a system in place to mitigate another human trait. The majority of us would rather not have personal responsibility for our own micro economy. So, if AI and deep learning has the potential to mitigate the risk and simplify the means of entering this world, it would bring the potential to utilities this system closer to mass adoption.
https://www.publish0x.com/?a=pmbkrQE5az
