What's wrong with the statement above? I don't think so because in reality this is what has been happening so far in the global conditions of human life.
Fake news, or you could say fake support. It's natural that it's been happening for a long time and don't say you didn't do it as long as you live. Is it true that 100% you live life with honesty?
Even if it was recently appointed , it has also become a spotlight on the problem of bad governance and other things . Moreover, everything goes in the money game game. It seems that it is indeed a wrong thing in the rules, but if your condition is pressed for a visa then the wrong one will also be taken in the end.
There have been a lot of actual trash faces like me doing stuff like this. Talk A but behind talk B. That is the fruit of honesty from human lies. I'm talking, not you, if you feel it, don't be angry, you should give more tips or at least give a thumbs up for this article.
Especially when talking about inter-community supporters in the crypto world. Actually there is no one who can be trusted which one really supports, because all apply based on payment for what is done. Don't believe? It seems that there is no need for proof for this, it is not clear that the problem of sposority always applies to the best over everything.
You want to be happy as a sponsor, you also want to be happy, of course. So in essence, don't say that one community with another is bad. Even if someone pays you a larger amount for you, I'm sure you will defend him. Because that is the reality of the nature of basic human needs. Talking money. So if you want me to support it, it means you can contact me for a reasonable fee, of course.
