The recent emergence of DePIN (decentralized physical infrastructure networks) offered a unique solution to the various limitations of centralization by presenting a distributed, incentivized system that integrates community-driven blockchain technology.
This decentralized route ensured individuals could participate in owning and managing physical infrastructure without having to rely on centralized providers.
In itself, DePIN’s potential applications cut across many sectors, including the IoT (Internet of Things), cloud computing, supply and logistics and more.
However, DePIN faces its own challenges and potential pitfalls that must be strategically addressed.
Otherwise, we might be looking at a repeat of what happened with Web 3.0 massive traction but unsustainable adoption.
Let’s explore some of these challenges and see how they directly affect the use, performance and adoption of DePIN solutions.
The scalability bottleneck
DePIN is a strong contender in at least two fields of the blockchain trilemma the very core of its identity is built on decentralization, and its architecture prioritizes security.
However, one of the biggest challenges that lurks in the shadow of DePIN is scalability.
As DePIN networks grow and expand, the volume of transactions across the blockchain network will also invariably increase.
Also, in sectors like IoT, where integration with the physical world is a fundamental necessity, data has to be constantly uploaded and transactions confirmed in real-time to allow users a smooth, seamless experience.
Unfortunately, the current blockchain infrastructure is simply not ready to handle the sheer scale and size of a fully matured DePIN ecosystem.
To circumvent this limitation, many DePIN projects like Render, Nosana, HiveMapper and Helium launched their networks on the Solana chain since it boasts high transaction speeds 10 times faster than Bitcoin up to 65,000 transactions per second.
However, Solana is plagued with its problem of performance instability and outages, with more than six major crashes so far.
Limited interoperability
The operational basis of the DePIN remains its ability to integrate, share and exchange data with other applications and blockchain networks.
However, most of the cross-chain and interoperability solutions that exist at the moment (e.g., side chains and zero-knowledge proof cross chains) are limited to only specific blockchain ecosystems.
This is not to mention the new layer of complexity they can introduce to the network due to their resource-intensive nature, which could also potentially contribute to slowing down the network’s processing speed.
Regulatory concerns
Another potential pitfall concerns regulatory compliance. While DePIN’s anonymous nature promotes privacy, it also makes it an ideal breeding ground for spurious projects and money laundering schemes.
With government regulations on many areas of blockchain and decentralization still sketchy, potential users still stand the risk of falling victim to rogue projects.
Many DePIN projects have yet to embrace an open-source model. Hence, there is often a lack of transparency on what is actually happening under the hood.
Is user data secure on the blockchain or is it being siphoned to a remote centralized server? This brings us to another important point.
DePIN theaters
In the early days of Web 3.0 and DeFi (decentralized finance), some projects kept up the appearance of decentralization but were far from being decentralized.
Fast forward to a few years later, we could also see the same patterns.
DePIN theaters are projects that masquerade as decentralized networks and ride on the wave of market trends and user sentiments.
These projects build on centralized infrastructure and rely on conventional providers while presenting a decentralized front to users.
They not only contradict the fundamental tenets of decentralization but also pose a danger to true DePIN projects.
They may also steal users’ funds or mine their data for monetary gain, thus tainting the public image and reputation of DePIN.
Undefined incentive mechanisms
DePIN relies on an incentive-based system to encourage community members to play their parts in the ecosystem by using their physical hardware to contribute to the network.
These rewards often exist as tokens or allocated points.
However, in many cases, these tokens have little or no utility outside the specific ecosystem they are earned, and community members can only spend them on designated items.
There are even DePIN projects without a properly defined incentive mechanism. This may discourage users long-term, causing them to abandon DePIN for other technologies.
What is the way forward
DePIN truly offers massive opportunities to redefine the digital world as we know it.
It could bridge the GPU compute shortfall, enhance data sovereignty and make critical services more affordable without compromising on security.
However, to ensure the long-term viability and sustainability of these advantages, it is imperative to understand that DePIN is still evolving.
As such, like every other emerging technology, there will often be ‘teething problems.’
As DePIN and blockchain technology grow and evolve, a lot of the challenges DePIN is currently susceptible to will be phased out by technological innovation.
However, in the immediate term, there are also proactive steps stakeholders in the DePIN sector can take to ensure a streamlined growth process.
These include better learning resources DePIN can be a particularly overwhelming sector with many components adopting an open-source approach to promote transparency and using a defined incentive mechanism.
Also, there is a need for a hardline stance on decentralization if it’s not running on a decentralized infrastructure, it is not DePIN.
The future is not written in stone. DePIN represents a world where the people control the narrative, and as it evolves to navigate the challenges of the modern world, its potential is limitless.
Daniel Keller is the CEO of InFlux Technologies and has more than 25 years of IT experience in technology, healthcare and nonprofit/charity works. He successfully manages infrastructure, bridges operational gaps and effectively deploys technological projects.
Featured Image: Shutterstock/Mia Stendal/WindAwake
