Centralized stablecoins may be about to face more scrutiny from the crypto community after it was revealed yesterday that issuer Centre has frozen an address holding USD 100,000 worth of the stablecoin.
The actual blacklisting of the address occurred back in June this year, and was reportedly done by Centre – a collaboration between major crypto company Circle and – on “request from law enforcement.”
“Centre complies with binding court orders that have appropriate jurisdiction over the organization,” Circle spokesperson Josh Hawkins told Coindesk.
Further details about the specific law enforcement request, including who owns the address, are still unknown at this point. We have contacted Centre for comment and will update the article should they reply.
In either case, the news raised more questions about the stablecoin business.
Jake Chervinsky, general counsel at decentralized finance (DeFi) platform Compound Finance, urged Centre to explain in detail the criteria they use to decide when to blacklist an address, while asking if the move came in response to a court order or was done voluntarily, and is there a process of appeal.
“This is important: USDC blacklisting has gone from a hypothetical concern to a real risk,” he said.
Already in 2018, that Circle retains the right to blacklist USDC addresses and freeze funds should they decide they are being used for illegal activities. However, the situation is similar in some other stablecoins: both and have clauses that say they reserve the right to refuse service to anyone they want to, without any explanation.
The freezing of the stablecoin holding also sheds new light on the sometimes-overlooked dangers of relying on centralized tokens.
Any Crypto with a CEO will eventually be threatened, fined, regulated, manipulated and centrally controlled #BuyBitcoin
— Lee Mosey (@Leemosey) July 8, 2020
@ljxie Also seems in the realm of possibility that many Bitcoin exchanges apply travel rule to create a new pool of… https://t.co/0wTPbetK2U
— Matt Ahlborg [UsefulTulips.org] (@MattAhlborg)
Also, when a crypto is backed by a real-world asset – as most stablecoins are – there is always a risk that the underlying asset could be confiscated, potentially causing the stablecoin to lose all its value even if the coins themselves aren’t “frozen.”
Despite the concerns surrounding USDC, however, it seems that USDC users have not reacted to the news. The price of USDC even briefly surged by as much as 0.65% and on high trading volume against USDT on exchange shortly after the news broke.
The counterintuitive move was also pointed by crypto trader Luke Martin, saying “that news + this chart has me confused.”
@VentureCoinist @jchervinsky @CurveFinance USDC now has "uncertainty" around it. Somebody gtfo of it into good ol' tether.
— sicarious (@Sicarious_)
However, others pointed out the lack of transparency and communication.
“USDC blacklisting an address happened back in mid-June, and only now hitting news cycles. Is anyone watching what happens on-chain? Reminds me of when and only COINBASE noticed, because we were actually watching. We need more watchers,” said Justin Mart, a data scientist working with Coinbase.
The news comes after Centre earlier this month announced that USDC had reached a market capitalization of USD 1 billion.
Stablecoins by market capitalization
___
Learn more: Stablecoins Might Be Better Than Bitcoin For Payments, But Maybe Not For Long